When is the deadline for respondent's statement of reasons why permission should be refused?
The catalogue records a 14 days period from Service of the appellant's notice, or of the skeleton argument if later. This draft page remains free only until its source, worked example and limits are reviewed.
Source link required
This page is in preparation. It does not offer an automated deadline or a paid record until the missing source or calculator evidence is complete.
In preparation
The existing catalogue does not yet have a registered adapter or source evidence for this exact question. It remains available as a public preparation page only.
Example pending review
A separately reviewed fixture is required before this question can become indexable. The page does not present an unreviewed output as an example.
Calculation basis and source
- Period
- 14 days
- Trigger
- Service of the appellant's notice, or of the skeleton argument if later
- Counting
- The encoded calculator method must be independently documented before publication.
- Rollovers and holidays
- Holiday, closure and order treatment must be independently documented before publication.
This route remains in preparation until a pinpoint official source is recorded.
- Permissive, not mandatory - the language is "permitted, and is encouraged", so there is no sanction for not filing and no need for an extension application. The court may direct otherwise under PD52C para 2.
- Optional but strategically important, and the trigger is a LATER-OF test (appellant's notice or skeleton argument), which the engine must model. Capped at 3 pages by PD52C para 19(1)(b) and must be directed to the permission threshold test. Costs position under PD52C para 20(1): "There will normally be no order for the recovery of the costs of a respondent's written statement."