When is the deadline for agreed statement of facts and issues?
The catalogue records a 112 days period from Filing of the notice of intention to proceed under r.19(1)(c), or issue of the notice of appeal under r.20(5). This draft page remains free only until its source, worked example and limits are reviewed.
Source link required
This page is in preparation. It does not offer an automated deadline or a paid record until the missing source or calculator evidence is complete.
In preparation
The existing catalogue does not yet have a registered adapter or source evidence for this exact question. It remains available as a public preparation page only.
Example pending review
A separately reviewed fixture is required before this question can become indexable. The page does not present an unreviewed output as an example.
Calculation basis and source
- Period
- 112 days
- Trigger
- Filing of the notice of intention to proceed under r.19(1)(c), or issue of the notice of appeal under r.20(5)
- Counting
- The encoded calculator method must be independently documented before publication.
- Rollovers and holidays
- Holiday, closure and order treatment must be independently documented before publication.
This route remains in preparation until a pinpoint official source is recorded.
- Extendable, and the mechanism is spelled out. UKSC PD 5.7: "Appellants who are unable to complete the preparation of the statement within the time limit may apply to the Registrar for an extension of that time under Rule 6... The Registrar may grant an application for an extension of time, provided that it does not prejudice the preparation for the hearing or its proposed date. The time limits provided by the Rules are, however, generous and applicants for an extension of time must set out in some detail why they are unable to comply with any relevant time limit." PD 5.8 adds that respondents "are expected not to withhold unreasonably their consent". So extensions are realistically available where the hearing date is not threatened, but require detailed justification.
- Classified binding=false because the Registrar has an express and regularly exercised extension power tied to whether the hearing date is prejudiced. Branching trigger depending on the r.19 or r.20 route. The document is neutral and jointly owned: PD 5.6 records that it "is drafted initially by the appellant but its contents must be agreed with every respondent", is "a neutral