When is the deadline for objection to an application to determine the exact line of a boundary (form db)?
The catalogue records a 20 working-days period from Date of issue of the registrar's notice to the owners of adjoining land. This draft page remains free only until its source, worked example and limits are reviewed.
Source link required
This page is in preparation. It does not offer an automated deadline or a paid record until the missing source or calculator evidence is complete.
In preparation
The existing catalogue does not yet have a registered adapter or source evidence for this exact question. It remains available as a public preparation page only.
Example pending review
A separately reviewed fixture is required before this question can become indexable. The page does not present an unreviewed output as an example.
Calculation basis and source
- Period
- 20 working-days
- Trigger
- Date of issue of the registrar's notice to the owners of adjoining land
- Counting
- The encoded calculator method must be independently documented before publication.
- Rollovers and holidays
- Holiday, closure and order treatment must be independently documented before publication.
This route remains in preparation until a pinpoint official source is recorded.
- Two distinct powers. Rule 119(3): the registrar may fix a longer period, but only before the notice is issued. Rule 119(4)-(5): after issue, an individual recipient may request an extension, which must be "received by the registrar before that period has expired"; the registrar may seek the applicant's views and then allow such period as he considers appropriate, with no statutory cap. The extension request itself is subject to a hard cut-off.
- Binding because rule 119(6) attaches a mandatory consequence: "Unless any recipient of the notice objects to the application to determine the exact line of the boundary within the time fixed by the notice (as extended under paragraph (5), if applicable), the registrar must complete the application." The boundary is then determined against the silent neighbour. Rule 119(2) dispe